This is an example of a non-disparagement agreement.
<h3><u>What is a non-disparagement agreement?</u></h3>
A part of an agreement, such as an employment contract, separation agreement, or marital settlement agreement, stipulates that the involved parties are prohibited from making any negative statements, remarks, or representations about each other. Such clauses are in prevalent use to prevent (ex) employees from adversely affecting the business of employers with disparaging public statements either during or after the employment period has ended.
<h3><u>What Takes Place If a Non-Disparagement Clause Is Broken?</u></h3>
A non-disparagement agreement is still a contract with potential legal repercussions if you don't uphold your half of the bargain, just like any other legal instrument. A breach of a non-disparagement agreement typically has financial repercussions. You might be required to repay all or a portion of your severance pay if non-disparagement was a requirement for you to receive it, depending on the terms of the agreement.
Learn more about the non-disparagement agreement with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14592097?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
C. Mortgage bond rated AAA is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is E) Sebastian checks if the job flow and procedures are logical.
Explanation:
The entry process means the beginning of the functions exercised by managers to determine if they are indeed making good use of tools for the understanding of their subordinates. If there is a logical order between the workflow and the procedures, it is said that the evaluation is executed in the best way, since in order to execute the work it is necessary to adhere to a series of guidelines that guarantee excellent and quality work.
Answer:
Res ipsa loquitur
Explanation:
_____ is a tort in which the presumption of negligence arises because the defendant was in exclusive control of the situation, and the plaintiff would not have suffered injury but for someone's negligence.
Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine in law that one can presume the negligence of a defendant when the facts are glaring.The doctrine has primarily required that a defendant have exclusive power over the occurrence of an injury. negligence could result from
1. an actual causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the resulting harm; 2 a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff; 3 a breach of that duty;
B. people who are "rehabilitated" still commit crimes once released from prison.