Answer:
The annual difference between Option 1 (15 years) and Option 2 (20 years) is $7,211.19 in favor of the first one.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Option 1:
Number of years= 15
FV= 450,000
i= 0.0525
Option 2:
Number of years= 20
FV= 450,000
i= 0.0525
To calculate the annual cash flow, we will use the following formula on each option:
A= (FV*i)/{[(1+i)^n]-1}
A= annual cash flow
<u>Option 1:</u>
A= (450,000*0.0525) / [(1.0525^15) - 1]
A= $20,464.72
<u>Option 2:</u>
A= (450,000*0.0525) / [(1.0525^20) - 1]
A= $13,253.53
The annual difference between Option 1 (15 years) and Option 2 (20 years) is $7,211.19 in favor of the first one.
Answer:
Call for someone then you need to help them as much as you can
Answer:
The correct answer is d) neither the long-run Phillips curve nor the Classical dichotomy.
Explanation:
The answer that best suits the situation described is the Phillips curve in the short term but not in the long term.
The Phillips curve starts from the principle that the amount of money circulating (commonly called "money supply") has real effects on the economy in the short term. In this way, an increase in the money supply would have a beneficial effect on aggregate demand, as citizens will spend more when their nominal wages are increased (known as “monetary illusion”) and a more favorable framework for investment and investment will be created. that the prospects of rising prices will improve the expectations of corporate profits. The improvement in aggregate demand would result in greater economic growth, and this in turn in the creation of new jobs. This is how an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment is established, expressed graphically by a downward curve.
When we're trying to determine a genetic foundation for intelligence and criminality we're allowing for the possibility of genetic determinism being a true thing which we obviously know it's not. For that reason it might be problematic to conclude anything about a genetic diagnosis for either of those considering there are always multiple variables which are at play.
Answer:
All the statements apply
Explanation:
1. Avoid mere mechanical descriptions.
This statement applies because it is an architectural proposal, thus, it should include aesthetic descriptions.
2. Emphasize the benefits to the recipient.
The proposal should include the ways CopperBuild would benefit the investors of the shopping center, from an architectural, and financial point of view.
3. Detail your expertise and accomplishments.
CopperBuild should add a few pages highlighting the firm's past experience, this in order to obtain more credibility.
4. Proposals are sales presentations.
This is a good analogy because what CopperBuild is doing by means of the proposal is selling "itself" (its experience, credibility, prestige) to the investors in order to get the contract.
