2 years ago

When making replacement decisions, the development of relevant cash flows is complicated when compared to expansion decisions.

Business

1 answer:

fgiga [73]2 years ago

4 0

Answer: True

Explanation:

Decision regarding an asset replacement is usually based on both the internal rate of return and the net present value of the incremental cash flows.

Therefore, it should be noted that this brings about the complications when comparing the development of relevant cash flows to the expansion decisions.

You might be interested in

The bank forecloses on Lisa's apartment complex. The property had been pledged as security on a nonrecourse mortgage, whose prin

skelet666 [1.2K]

Answer: $400,000

Explanation:

Based on the information given in the question, Lisa's recognized gain or loss will be calculated as the difference between the amount that's realized and the adjusted basis. This will be:

Recognized gain will be:

= Amount realized - Adjusted basis

= $900,000 - $500,000

= $400,000

There's a recognized gain of $400,000

6 0

2 years ago

(a) When an anti-assignment clause exists in a contract, a court will not enforce it because it is against public policy.

lidiya [134]

Answer:

a. FALSE

b. A contract cannot forbid the assignment of the right to receive funds . Assignments also cannot be restricted for the transfer of real estate , also called a restraint against alienation . A contract cannot prohibit the assignment of checks or promissory notes, also called negotiable instruments . The right to receive damages in a contract for the sale of goods also can be assigned, even if the contract forbids it.