Answer: It is relevant and sufficient, because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork.
Explanation:
Parvati's argument in favor of using cell phones in class is valid and sufficient. The evidence she presents is strong - she claims that cell phones are useful research tools that enable us to find the right piece of information. She also provides specific examples and even explains a situation in her class where cell phones were used. This makes her argument convincing, because she supports her claim with solid evidence.
<em>Answers</em>
Alliteration = B; The repetition of beginning sounds in two or more neighboring words.
Idiom = C; An expression that cannot be understood from the meanings of its separate words but must be learned as a whole.
Meiosis = A; A statement that downplays or understates the importance of something.
It would be dialogue because there are no stage directions and this is not narrating anything.
Answer:
B). No more kerosene lamps that burned our eyes and sent us gasping for breath.
Explanation:
In the given excerpt, the line 'No more...breath' reflects the background regarding Malawai and the way windmill would consider the interest of its people. It shows that the windmill would provide electricity to the people and thus, kerosene lamps are not required anymore and prevent the struggles people of Malawai had to do for it. Earlier the people were compelled to go to bed in the early evening but the windmill allowed people to read at night and do other activities as well. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
