A common misconception in statistics is confusing correlation with causation. If two events are correlated, it merely means that they share the same behaviour over time, but it doesn't imply in any way that those event are related by a common cause, or even worse, that one implies the other.
You can find several (even humorous) counter examples online. For example, if you plot the number of reported pirates assault against the global temperature in the last years, you'll se that temperature is rising (unfortunately...) while pirates are almost disappearing.
One could observe this strong negative correlation and claim that hotter climate has solved the pirate issue. Of course this is a joke, but it explains why you shouldn't confuse correlation with causation.
The change is 6 because the pouts you lose depends on how many times you leave the shoes at home
Ex: (A) 19.95÷29.95 and you will get your answers
Check the attached file for the answer.
1) 12 out of 14 = 85% Win Rate
2) Now you have to figure out what is 85% of 21 so you have to plug in what you have ? out of 21 = .85
3) Multiply 21 x .85
4) Answer is They will win 18 out of 21 games
