Answer: $322,000
Explanation:
Consolidated income = Net income from Ackerman + Net Income from Brannigan + Excess depreciation - Amortization of unpatented tech - Gain from transfer of equipment
Excess depreciation = New depreciation of equipment - Old depreciation
Depreciation is straight line;
= (200,000/5 years) - (110,000/5)
= $18,000
Gain from transfer of equipment
= Sales - Book value
= 200,000 - 110,000
= $90,000
Consolidated income = 300,000 + 98,000 + 18,000 - 4,000 - 90,000
= $322,000
Answer:
$60,000
Explanation:
Hansen's annual salary allowance= 30,000
Hernandez's annual salary allowance= 10,000
annual interest allowance of Hensen= 0.1 × 50,000= 5000
annual interest allowance of Hernandez= 0.1 × 50,000= 5000
Remaining balance=100000- 5000-5000-30000-10000= 50000
Share of each partner from remaining balance= 25000
Hensen's income= 25,000+ 5000+ 30000= 60,000
Answer: d. $282,000
Explanation:
The workforce complement is to increase by 10%;
= 471 * 10%
= 47.1
= 47 people
Recruiting cost = 47 * (recruiting base + recruiting spend)
= 47 * ( 1,000 + 5,000)
= $282,000
Answer:
Solution as seen below
Explanation:
Bond = 1,700 × $1,000 × 98%
= $1,666,000
Allocation :
Issue price $1,751,000
(1,700 × $1,000 × 103%)
Bonds ( $1,666,000 )
Warrants $85,000
($1,751,000 - $1,666,000)
Bond face value $1,700,000
(1,700 × $1,000)
Allocated FMV ($1,666,000)
Discounts $34,000
($1,700,000 - $1,666,000)
Answer:
Right now marcantuone and robert gieson ought not be held at risk for what the drycleaner inhabitants did.Because there was no release of perilous substance during their ownership.The chlorinated dissolvable pollution issue right now the aftereffect of dry cleaning activity led preceding the condemnee's acquisition of the property.There was no proof of a release of unsafe substance during the time of condemnee's ownership.The sullying was not found until after the condemner had procured the title to the property in the judgement activity.
As indicated by the spill demonstration the obligation is vested on a condemner who bought debased property and didn't attempt any assessment or examination at the hour of procurement.
