Answer:
Explanation:
Given function: f(x) = -2x² - 3x + 20
To find the x-intercepts of a function, f(x) = 0
=================
-2x² - 3x + 20 = f(x)
-2x² - 3x + 20 = 0
-2x² - 8x + 5x + 20 = 0
-2x(x + 4) + 5(x + 4) = 0
(-2x + 5) (x + 4) = 0
-2x + 5 = 0, x + 4 = 0
-2x = -5, x = -4
x = -5/-2,x = -4
x = 5/2, x= -4
Coordinates: (-4, 0), (5/2, 0)
Answer:
The bill before the tip was $13.75 if you add a 20% tip of $2.75 the total bill including the tip would be $16.50
The bill before the tip is $13.75
No; we have . Substituting these into the DE gives
which reduces to , true only for .
Answer:
Table A
Step-by-step explanation:
In order for it to be a linear relationship, the change in the x values and y values (f(x)) needs to be consistent.
In every table, the x values change the same, so we can focus on the y values.
Notice in table A, the f(x) values go down consistently by 10 for every change in x.
All of the other tables are not consistent.
Therefore, table A is the only linear function.
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.