In order to prove Rathan wrong, we only need one counterexample. Take the number 6. 6 is even, but it has the odd number 3 as a factor, so clearly, not all factors of even numbers are even.
Given function is f(x) = x³ -12x +16.
We can write it as x³ +0x² -12x +16.
We need to write the numbers in order from left to right, so it would be {1, 0, -12, 16}.
Given factor is x -2 = 0, that means x = 2. So we need to divide the numbers by 2.
So correct way to divide the function would be 2 L 1, 0, -12, 16.
Hence, option C is correct.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a(20ft)
b(46ft)
c(72.6mm)
Answer:
No, I do not agree with the conjecture because 1 is not a prime number.
Step-by-step explanation:
A prime number is one that can be divided by 1 and itself only. Thus it can be expressed in 2 factors only, 1 and the number itself.
Examples are; 2, 3, 5, 13, 19 , 23 etc.
So, 2 = 1 x 2
3 = 1 x 3
23 = 1 x 23
Prime numbers must be expressed as the product of 1 and the number.
The conjecture that every prime number can be expressed as the product of two prime numbers is false. Because 1 is not a prime number, since it has no 2 factors.