Answer:
Which of the following issues can be offered to the public under the 1933 Act?
1. An exempt security.
2. A security registered under the Act.
Explanation:
The security's act of 1933 was formulated and passed into law in 1933 to protect investors after the stock market crash of 1929. The law had two major objectives; to enable transparency especially in the financial statements so that investors can make decisions after considering all aspects and also to provide regulations against misrepresentation to discourage cases of fraud in the securities markets.
The security's act of 1933 provided legislation on the sale of securities which was initially governed by the state laws. The law required the companies to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for full disclosure to potential investors. The information is provided to SEC and the potential investors in the form of a prospectus and a statement of registration.
The following issues are including in what can be offered to the public under this act, namely;
1. An exempt security.
2. A security registered under the Act.
However, the SEC does not approve a prospectus therefor issue number three is not true.
The practice of buying goods and services now and paying for them later is termed is<u> Bartering</u>.
A barter is a transaction in which two or more parties exchange products or services without exchanging cash or other forms of payment like credit cards.
In its simplest form, bartering entails the exchange of one party's good or service for another party's good or service.
A carpenter who constructs a fence for a farmer is a straightforward illustration of a barter transaction.
The farmer might compensate the carpenter with $1,000 worth of crops or groceries rather than paying the builder $1,000 in cash for labor and supplies.
To learn more about Bartering here
brainly.com/question/14903216
#SPJ4
Answer:
D. Admiration
Explanation:
One of the very convenient ways to answer this question is to eliminate the wrong choices. For instance, the use of a famous personality as a brand ambassador especially of a very expensive brand of clothing and accessories cannot be for health reasons (it is not a food item neither is it medicine, exercise or body product).
Also, it can't be fear or convenience. In fact, it is the opposite of convenience, because a very expensive brand of clothing and accessories will not be very financially convenient for a middle class community and will probably be most affordable to the high class in the society.
The obvious choice in this question is therefore admiration. People naturally admire famous personalities in the society for different reasons; they have attained a level of success, they are beautiful or graceful, they are rich or represent something the average person wants to become.
It is therefore, reasonable for people to want to by things in order to have a form of connection to the famous personality they admire who is the brand ambassador of that particular product.
Duski's appeal therefore, is that of admiration.
The changes in trade that would produce the greatest increase in GDP is increasing the sales of domestic Consumption and increasing trade surplus
GDP is calculated by :
C + I + G + (Ex - Im)
Hope this helps
