Answer:
C.$46,730
Explanation:
Nadal Corporation manufactures custom molds for use in the extrusion industry. Based on the data available we first see the formula to calculate the total manufacturing cost of the job 532.
In general, sum of all the cost directly or indirectly included in the manufacturing cost. Therefore the formula is as below
Total Manufacturing Cost = Direct Labor Cost + Direct Materials Cost + Manufacturing Overhead Cost.
Direct labor cost $36,800
Direct materials used $5,000
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate based on machine hours $17 which is = $17 x 290 hours
Manufacturing cots= 4930$
Total Manufacturing Cost = 36800 + 5000 + 4930
Total Manufacturing Cost = 46,730$
In this problem we are given the mean of $1100, SD of $150 and x equal to $900. In this case, we need to use the z-score table to answer the problem:
z = (x-mean)/sd
z = (900-1100)/150
z = -1.33
from z-table, the probability at the left of z= -1.33 is equal to 9.18%
Answer:
$800
Explanation:
Pedro's tuition costs of $6,000 is a personal expense and does not qualify as a charitable contribution.
Pedro's donation to the church of $1,000 is charity, but he has to deduct the registration fee of $200 from it. Thus, his total charitable contribution is $1,000 - $200 = $800
Answer:
3,000 units and 1,950 units
Explanation:
For computing the equivalent units of ending work in process for materials and conversion cost, first we have to determine the ending work in process units which is shown below:
Ending work in process units = Beginning inventory + units started - units completed and transferred
= 2,500 units + 18,000 units - 17,500 units
= 3,000 units
Now the equivalent units of ending work in process for materials would be
= 3,000 units × 100%
= 3,000 units
And, for conversion cost it would be
= 3,000 units × 65%
= 1,950 units
Answer:
Quality of supervision
Explanation:
Herzberg's 2 factor theory included motivational factors and hygiene factors.
Motivational factors are those which enable an employees or a workers to contribute their best efforts with utmost efficiency.
Hygiene factors on the other hand convey to the contrary i.e such factors lead to a reduction in the productivity and efficiency of workers.
One of the hygiene factor specified by Herzberg is supervision as per which poor supervision or command leads to job dissatisfaction among workers.
An organization must eliminate hygiene factors so as the employees are motivated to work and contribute optimally towards attainment of organizational goals.