Answer:
The answer is $0.12 gain
Explanation:
We will be obtaining the no-arbitrage premium of the corresponding put as dictated by put-call parity, as follows: V P (0, K = 70, T = 0.5) = V C (K = 70, T = 0.5) + e rt K S(0) + P V 0,T (Dividends)
= 6.50 + exponential (0.03 70 74.20) + e (0.06 0.25 1.10) + e (0.06 0.5 1.10)
= 67.70 + 0.97 70 + 0.98 1.10 + 0.97 1.10
= 67.70 + 68.97 + 1.08 = 2.38.
Since we have decided to short the call at a premium higher by $0.12, the answer is $0.12 gain.
Thank you.
Answer:
c. Matt has anxiety about giving his speech, so he works on his linguistics homework to distract himself.
Explanation:
The behavior that represent the examples with respect to the speaker effectively preparing for the lecture are as follows:
a. The john types a copy of his speech where there is non expected moment comes
b. Eva remember her total speech as she want to neglect the rigidity
c, The molly records her speech and she plays it back so to be sure that she speaks clearly or not
So as per the given situation, the option c should be considered
Answer: A. Alaska auctions a limited number of licenses to harvest king crab.
Explanation:
The options include:
A. Alaska auctions a limited number of licenses to harvest king crab.
B. The U.S. and Canadian governments remove trade barriers, which allows for more trade of products like king crab.
C. Alaska removes taxes on diesel fuel, which lowers the price of diesel.
D. Alaska subsidizes the purchase of crab boats.
The socially optimal level of output will be achieved when there's allocative efficiency. It is the level whereby market failure is curtailed.
The policy choice that might produce the socially optimal king crab harvest is for Alaska to auction a limited number of licenses to harvest king crab.
This will help in the reduction at which the resource is overused as there'll be regulation and reduction in the number of person that can harvest king crab.
