When we look back in the past of Chilean literature, Manuel Rojas, started his writing career in between the naturalist movement. To understand more, we can relate realism and naturalism. First, naturalists' writing involved an extreme portrayal of realism which focused more on barbaric attributes of the human race. And then, the characters included in such stories belonged to the bottom of the society, with an unsavory description.
We notice a non-participant narrator in this tale of kindness. He's a third-person narrator who is limited to the visuals and physical activities of the characters but has no access to their thoughts. However, he describes the mentality of the young boy. This effect is created to focus more on the conditions and their impact, on the miserable life.
Through this, it is easy to infer that the third choice would get you the best marks.
=> The use of third-person limited point of view allows the reader to better understand the main character.
Answer:
This would depend on which side you are on, so if you are on the side allowing students to text at school, you can say it opens resources for students as well as a source of communication. However, personally I think that the argument that students shouldn't text would be easier because it has more evidence. You can say students can cheat, they can get distracted which will lead to bad grades etc
Answer:
I think it will be B or C.
Explanation:
1. It produces heat, that helps in heating parts of any object or to warm ourselves.
2. It also causes loss in power.
mark me brainliest if the answer is correct, thank you in advance :)
