Answer:
Equivalent expressions
A) 
C) 
Step-by-step explanation:
Given expression :
Choices given :
A)
B) 
C)
D) 
To find the equivalent expression.
We will first evaluate the given expression.
⇒ 
[Quotient of a negative dividend and a positive divisor is always negative]
Evaluating each choice to select the equivalents.
A)
⇒ [Quotient of a positive dividend and a negative divisor is always negative]
B)
⇒ 
⇒ 
C)
⇒ 
[Product of a positive and a negative is always a negative]
⇒
D)
⇒ [Product of two negatives is always a positive]
⇒
∴ We see that the choices A and C are equivalent.
The second option is correct, I,e what you've chosen
Answer:
sorry if im wrong i think wrong numbers. plz check
Step-by-step explanation:
The center of dilation of the question is (-4,-3) .
let say that
x0=-4
y0=-3
Label the image A'B'C'
The new coordinate would be
A(-4,-1)
x=4
y=-1
x'=x0+ 2(x - x0)
x'= -4+ 2(-4 +4)
x'=-4
y'=y0+ 2(y - y0)
y'= -3+ 2(-1 +3)
y'=-3 +4= 1
______________________________
B(-4,-3)
x=-4
y=-3
x'=x0+ 2(x - x0)
x'= -4+ 2(-4 +4)
x'=-4
y'=y0+ 2(y - y0)
y'= -3+ 2(-3 +3)
y'=-3
______________________________
C(-1,-3)
x=-1
y=-3
x'=x0+ 2(x - x0)
x'= -4+ 2(-1 +4)
x'=-4 +6= 2
y'=y0+ 2(y - y0)
y'= -3+ 2(-3 +3)
y'=-3
A'(-4,1)
B'(-4,-3)
C'(2,-3)
340 you were right
Step-by-step explanation:
5) The relation between intensity and current appears linear for intensity of 300 or more (current = intensity/10). For intensity of 150, current is less than that linear relation would predict. This seems to support the notion that current will go to zero for zero intensity. Current might even be negative for zero intensity since the line through the points (300, 30) and (150, 10) will have a negative intercept (-10) when current is zero.
Usually, we expect no output from a power-translating device when there is no input, so we expect current = 0 when intensity = 0.
6) We have no reason to believe the linear relation will not continue to hold for values of intensity near those already shown. We expect the current to be 100 for in intensity of 1000.
8) Apparently, times were only measured for 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12 laps. The author of the graph did not want to extrapolate beyond the data collected--a reasonable choice.
