Answer:
The answer is in a perfect competition profit is maximized when marginal cost equal marginal revenue and price is equal to average revenue and marginal revenue, while in monopolist profit is maximized when marginal cost is equal to marginal revenue.
Explanation:
The firm in a perfectly competitive market is a price taker,the price in the market is determined by the market forces of demand and supply. The firm has to sell their product at the ruling market price.The demand curve facing the firm in perfectly competitive market is horizontal or perfectly elastic, profit is therefore maximized when the marginal cost is equal to average revenue and marginal revenue. The firm in the market operate at the output level in which the price and marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost. Whatever prices that change the market demand or supply will change the demand curve faced by the firm.The firm cannot do anything to this than to accept the market price and the demand curve.
In a monopoly the demand curve is identical to the demand curve of the firm, because industry demand curve is downward sloping.The monopolist can either set the price or quantity not the two.when one is determined the value of the other will be determined by the demand function. The profit maximization of the monopolist also requires that marginal cost must be equal to marginal revenue just like in the case of perfect completion.when the monopolist equates MR and MC the monopolist determines its output and the market price for the product. The revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve,because the straight line is the market demand. The firm will have to reduce The price of the product if they want to sell more of their product the unit of the product sold is the AR which is equal to the price.Therefore the AR curve of the monopolist and the perfect competition MR and AR are both identical that informed the reason why the marginal revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve for a single price monopolist.
Answer:
Investor A = $545216 .
Investor B = $352377
Investor C = $897594
Explanation:
Annual rate ( r ) = 9.38%
N = 41 years
<u> Calculate the balance at age of 65</u>
1) For Investor A
balance at the end of 10 years
= $2000 (FIA, 9.38 %, 10) (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $33845
Hence at the end of 65 years ( balance )
= $33845 (FIP, 9.38 %, 31) ≈ $545216 .
2) For investor B
at the age of 65 years ( balance )
= $2000 (FIP, 9.38%, 31) = $322159 x (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $352377
3) For Investor C
at the age of 65 years ( balance )
= $2000 (FIP, 9.38%, 41) = $820620 x (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $897594
The answer is "Certified Computer Forensic Technician, Basic".
Certified Computer Forensic Technician, Basic is Three (3) years experience specifically identified with the scientific procurement and examination of computerized gadgets including yet not restricted to hard drives, tablets or potentially phones while utilized by a law authorization office or enterprise.
Successfully complete an aggregate of forty (40) hours preparing course(s) for the measurable obtaining and investigation of hard drives, tablets or potentially PDAs given by an affirmed office, association or organization.
Give an account report itemizing your experience got from the measurable obtaining and investigation of computerized gadgets including however not restricted to hard drives, tablets or potentially phones of no less than ten (10) scientific cases while utilized by a law implementation office or company.
The given statement about cost is a true statement as cost becomes most obvious when more money must be spent on one thing, leaving less available for another.
<h3>What is the cost?</h3>
A cost is often the value of the money that was expended during the production or delivery of something or service and is now unavailable for use.
Manufacturing, research, retail, and accountancy all make use of this idea. In business transactions, the cost may be an acquisition cost, in which case the amount of money spent to acquire it is considered to be part of the cost.
Finally, cost becomes most apparent when more money spent on one thing leaves less money for another. This corresponds to a true statement.
As a result, opportunity cost describes a decision we must make in order to make another one.
You have $50, for instance, which you may spend on a date with your partner or on your preferred game. The inability to purchase the game is your opportunity cost if you decide to utilize that money to take your partner out on a date.
Check out the link below to learn more about costs;
brainly.com/question/28343978
#SPJ4
