Answer:
B
Explanation:
It really depends on what was underlined. There are two possibilities.
- I think that not a single peace loving State could decline a peace treaty with a neighboring State even though the latter was headed by such fiends and cannibals as Hitler and Ribbentrop.
- Non-aggression pacts are pacts of peace between two States. It was such a pact that Germany proposed to us in 1939.
The first one is irony of the highest order. Though Stalin was correct in his assessment of Hitler and Ribbentrop, he didn't include himself (who may have been the worst of the three), in his description.
The second one is just a definition of what a non-aggression pact was.
I would pick B. The real problem is what is underlined. B is the truth. It was actually Hitler's plan to invade Russia long before it happened. Not only that, he was so confident of victory that he did not order his textile industry to make protective clothing when he did invade Russia. He thought it would be over in Russia long before such clothing was needed.
Dynamic :^)
hope this helps!
Answer:
The detail is given below:
Explanation:
This question is from the story ''Orpheus and Eurydice''. The third paragraph represents the whole idea of the story. It is about the analysis of the personality of a person, who got motivated by their own goods and bads. It says that if one can find true love, then the suffering is worth it.
We can even sacrifice ourselves for true love and that won't be a waste. This story shows the importance of trust and how it can change once life.
A - true
because is known that asbestos can produce lung cancer or other type of cancer
