The correct option is (b) Protective tariffs
Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry.
<h3 /><h3>What is protective tarrifs?</h3>
- An illustration of a protective tariff would be the US raising the customs charge on clothing imported from Britain so that it is significantly more expensive than clothing made domestically.
- The importing countries profit the most from tariffs since they design the policy and receive the cash.
- The main advantage of tariffs is that they generate income from imported products and services. Tariffs may also serve as a springboard for negotiations between two countries.
- Protective tariffs are designed to shield vital American industries from international competition, stop foreign manufacturers from dumping inexpensive goods in the US, or both.
Learn more about the Tarrifs with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11672570
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is "Which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the North and South?
(a) Dred Scott decision
(b) Protective tariffs
(c) Bleeding Kansas
(d) Lincoln’s election"
If there is no unity in a shared system, then diversity can become chaos.
Answer:A) one year
Explanation: The unbiased expectations theory, also known as the expectation theory aims to estimate how much the short term interest rates will amount to in future. This is based on long term interest rates. Forward rates are used to predict the value of interests in the future based on the values calculated today. A maturity of 1 year has the lowest interest rate because it is not given enough time to grow. Interest rates tend to grow better over a longer period of time. Therefore in terms of expectation theory the longer the maturity the better the chances of interest rate growth.
Answer:
The answer is lose-lose
Explanation:
In a lose-lose approach, one's actions hurt oneself as much as they do their opponent.
