To calculate:
1) Net income (loss) for 2010.
2) Operating cash flow
Solution: 1)
Sales = $850000
Less: Cost of goods sold = $610000
Gross profit = $240000
Less: Administrative and selling expenses = $110000
Earning before Interest, Tax and Depreciation = $130000
Less: Depreciation = $140000
Earning before Interest and Tax (EBIT) = ($10000)
Less: Interest expense = $85000
Earning before tax (EBT) = ($95000)
Less: Tax = $0 (as company is having negative EBT or loss hence no tax)
Net loss = $95000
2) Operating cash flow
EBIT + Depreciation - Tax
Wherein, EBIT = Earning before Interest and Tax
($10000) + 140000 - 0 = $130000
Answer:
Cash flow = $35
Explanation:
Cash flow= Payout ratio*net income-price of stock= 0.30*400-85=35
Answer:
The answer is Place
Explanation:
In the marketing mix, the process of moving products from the producer to the intended user is called place. In other words, it is how your product is bought and where it is bought. This movement could be through a combination of intermediaries such as distributors, wholesalers and retailers.
<span>The speaker is using the fallacy of building on an unproven assumption. The speaker has made the assumption that the Japanese make the best stereo sound systems in the world. This is merely his/her opinion, and is not a proven fact. Thus, when the speaker bases another argument on that assumption, he has used a fallacy in reasoning.</span>
Answer:
The Answer is D: Nominal group technique
Explanation:
From the question, it is clear that the CEO of Mi Ola is encouraging everyone to bring up that idea they have in mind. She is encouraging everyone to make a decision as it is never wrong as long as you're moving. Bounded rationality talks about making rational decisions that will most likely satisfy personal needs. This does not seem to be the kind of statement made here. The statement is like a booster to everyone to come up with ideas, which bring us to the concept of nominal group technique. This technique encourages contributions from an entire team and encourages swift agreement on the relative significance of problems, issues, and solutions.