Answer:
a) price of $7 and quantity of 50 units
Explanation:
According to what I'm understanding of the table you got the following:
The equilibrium will be when both forces meet in this case, it is clear that it is happening at a price equal to $7 which generates a supply of 50 units and a demand for 50 units. Both have the same value so it is equilibrium
Answer:
b. AgCo will sell no bushels of corn.
Explanation:
A perfectly competitive market refers to market has many buyers and sellers will all the market selling the undifferentiated product without any difference.
Some of the others attributes of a perfectly competitive market are that buyers and sellers have perfect information about the price of a good, no barriers to entry and exit, similar products are being sold, there are free entry and exit to the market, and all sellers are price takers.
All sellers are price takers implies that the price of good is determined or given by the market. Therefore, any attempt to increase the price beyond the price given by the market will result into a zero sale because the buyers will immediately switch to another seller selling at the market price which lower.
Based on the above explanation, AgCo will sell no bushels of corn because its prices at $4.10 per bushel for its corn is higher than the current market price for a bushel of corn of $4.00.
with semen and a fertilized egg
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: means that the firm's cost structure is not to low enough to allow it to attractively price its products and that its products are not sufficiently differentiated to create value for its target customer.
Explanation:
To begin with, the term called<em> ''stuck in the middle''</em> is known in the business world for the main reason of <em>being stuck in a situation where the costs of the firms are to high</em> to allow them to have competitive and attractive prices and and that also<em> these companies do no differentiate their product enough</em> in the way to generate value to the customer they want to reach and therefore it is said that these firms are stuck in the middle due to the fact that <u><em>they can not improve their benefits</em></u> because of their high cost structure and low differentation.