Answer: $294,000
Explanation:
Gift of $71,000 is <u>time restricted</u> as it cannot be spent for 4 years.
Gift of $91,000 is <u>purpose restricted</u> as it must be used for the purpose of salaries.
Gift of $121,000 is <u>permanently restricted</u> as it must be held forever.
Income earned from the above gift of $11,000 is <u>purpose restricted</u> for needy families.
The gifts with donor restrictions total:
= 71,000 + 91,000 + 121,000 + 11,000
= $294,000
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Given that,
Price of low-quality apples = $1 per pound
Price of high-quality apples = $4 per pound
Marginal utility of low-quality apples = 3 utils
Marginal utility of high-quality apples = 12 utils
Equimarginal:
(Marginal utility of low quality apples ÷ Price per apple) = (Marginal utility of high quality apples ÷ Price per apples)
(3 utils ÷ $1) = (12 utils ÷ $4)
3 = 3
Yes, Timmy is maximizing his utility as his equimarginal utility is same for both the goods as shown above.
The conductivity of the object
Answer:
BMI = 31.18 kg/m²
According to BMI, this patient is diagnosed as Obese.
Explanation:
BMI known as body mass index is taken from a person height and weight. BMI is a person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI is usually expressed in kg/m².
Mathematically ,
BMI = weight(kg)/height(m²)
we have to convert the weight and the height to the required units.
converting pounds to kg
2.2 pounds = 1 kilogram
210 pounds = ?
cross multiply
210/2.2 = 95.50 kilograms
converting foot to inches and to meter.
1 foot = 12 inches
5 foot = ?
12 × 5 = 60 inches
60 inches + 9 inches = 69 inches
1 inches = 0.0254 meters
69 inches = ?
69 × 0.0254 = 1.7526 meters
using the formula
BMI = weight(kg)/height(m²)
BMI = 95.50/(1.75)²
BMI = 95.50/3.0625 kg/m²
BMI = 31.1836734694 kg/m²
BMI = 31.18 kg/m²
M1 money growth in the US was about 16% in 2008, 7% in 2009 and 9% in 2010. Over the same time period, the yield on 3-month Treasury bills fell from almost 3% to close to 0%. Given these high rates of money growth, why did interest rates fall, rather than increase? What does this say about the income, price level and expected-inflation effects?
Higher money growth (increase in the money supply) should have the following effects:
Liquidity effect indicates that this growth in money should shift money supply to the right, which should decrease the interest rate.
Income effect indicates that the growth in money should increase income levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should increase the interest rate.
The price level effect indicates that the growth in money should increase price levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should also increase the interest rate.
During this time period, unemployment was high, economic growth was weak and policymakers were more concerned with deflation than they were with inflation.
Therefore, the expected inflation effect was almost non-existent (due to the concerns with deflation) and the liquidity effect dominated all other effects, which made interest rates fall.
<span>This is illustrated with the first graph on slide 32 of the Theory of Money Powerpoints.</span>