Answer:
Silven Industries
If Silven buys its tubes from the outside supplier, it will be able to avoid $1.10 of its own Chap-Off manufacturing costs per box
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Estimated Production and Sales Units of Chap-Off = 140,000 boxes
Manufacturing cost per box: Avoidable costs
Direct material $ 3.70 $0.74 ($3.70 * 20%)
Direct labor 2.00 0.20 ($2.00 * 10%)
Manufacturing overhead 1.60 0.16 ($1.60 * 10%)
Total cost $ 7.30 $1.10
Outside supplier's price for tubes = $1.20 per box
b) Unless there an alternative use for the machine used in making the tubes internally exists, it may not be cost-effective for Silven to buy from the outside supplier. Alternatively, it should renegotiate a price per box that is less than $1.10 in order to stop making the tubes internally.
C is correct.
As a result of a tariff, prices for domestic steel consumers go up so D is false. Option B is false because it does not make the market fair for everyone as now domestic producers can charge a higher price since foreign competition is being excluded. Since B, D are false it would make sense that A is also untrue as consumers are now suffering while it is the producers who benefit.
Credit side of a the balance of revenue account is transferred
Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.
