Answer:
{x}^{4}+4{x}^{3}y+6{x}^{2}{y}^{2}+4x{y}^{3}+{y}^{4}x
4
+4x
3
y+6x
2
y
2
+4xy
3
+y
4
Step-by-step explanation:
1 Use Square of Sum: {(a+b)}^{2}={a}^{2}+2ab+{b}^{2}(a+b)
2
=a
2
+2ab+b
2
.
({x}^{2}+2xy+{y}^{2})({x}^{2}+2xy+{y}^{2})(x
2
+2xy+y
2
)(x
2
+2xy+y
2
)
2 Expand by distributing sum groups.
{x}^{2}({x}^{2}+2xy+{y}^{2})+2xy({x}^{2}+2xy+{y}^{2})+{y}^{2}({x}^{2}+2xy+{y}^{2})x
2
(x
2
+2xy+y
2
)+2xy(x
2
+2xy+y
2
)+y
2
(x
2
+2xy+y
2
)
3 Expand by distributing terms.
{x}^{4}+2{x}^{3}y+{x}^{2}{y}^{2}+2xy({x}^{2}+2xy+{y}^{2})+{y}^{2}({x}^{2}+2xy+{y}^{2})x
4
+2x
3
y+x
2
y
2
+2xy(x
2
+2xy+y
2
)+y
2
(x
2
+2xy+y
2
)
4 Expand by distributing terms.
{x}^{4}+2{x}^{3}y+{x}^{2}{y}^{2}+2{x}^{3}y+4{x}^{2}{y}^{2}+2x{y}^{3}+{y}^{2}({x}^{2}+2xy+{y}^{2})x
4
+2x
3
y+x
2
y
2
+2x
3
y+4x
2
y
2
+2xy
3
+y
2
(x
2
+2xy+y
2
)
5 Expand by distributing terms.
{x}^{4}+2{x}^{3}y+{x}^{2}{y}^{2}+2{x}^{3}y+4{x}^{2}{y}^{2}+2x{y}^{3}+{y}^{2}{x}^{2}+2{y}^{3}x+{y}^{4}x
4
+2x
3
y+x
2
y
2
+2x
3
y+4x
2
y
2
+2xy
3
+y
2
x
2
+2y
3
x+y
4
6 Collect like terms.
{x}^{4}+(2{x}^{3}y+2{x}^{3}y)+({x}^{2}{y}^{2}+4{x}^{2}{y}^{2}+{x}^{2}{y}^{2})+(2x{y}^{3}+2x{y}^{3})+{y}^{4}x
4
+(2x
3
y+2x
3
y)+(x
2
y
2
+4x
2
y
2
+x
2
y
2
)+(2xy
3
+2xy
3
)+y
4
7 Simplify.
{x}^{4}+4{x}^{3}y+6{x}^{2}{y}^{2}+4x{y}^{3}+{y}^{4}x
4
+4x
3
y+6x
2
y
2
+4xy
3
+y
4
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's put the data as below:
n1=15 x1=2.8 s1=1.6 and s1²=2.56
n2=19 x2=2.4 s2=1.7 and s2²=2.89
alpha= 0.05
To test the hypothesis:
H0= There is no sufficient evidence that low income household have fewer children
H1=There is sufficient evidence that low income household have fewer children
Assume that population variances are equal.
the t-static for two samples,
~t with min (n1-1,n2-1)df
The pooled variance estimate Sp equals:
Sp²=2.7456
Sp=1.65699
Degrees of freedom=n1+n2-2=32
Under null hypothesis:
The critical value ttab=2.0369 for alpha=0.05
So we reject our null hypothesis H0
So there is sufficient evidence that low income households have fewer children than high income households
Answer:
Exact form: 44/15
Decimal form: 2.93 repeating
Mixed number form: 2 14/15
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer and Step-by-step explanation:
× 12 can also be written as because the 12 is multiplying the numerator of the fraction.
12 can also be written as .
When we solve, this is what is happening:
×
The 12 will be multiplying the 2, while the 1 will be multiplying the 3. Because 3 times 1 is 3, we don't show the 1. So, that can leave us with 2 being multiplied by 12 in the numerator.
<em><u>#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)</u></em>