Answer:
The market value of equity should be used.
Explanation:
Their are only two methods which are book value method or market value method. The market value method is preferred because the reason is that the market value gives the more accurate numerical value that the securities of the company will give which is the required rate of return to its investors. However historic cost data is not useful because the value of stock and bonds keeps changing every second in the stock exchange and their is the risk that the WACC calculated is inaccurate which implies that the project appraised is also incorrect.
So the best way to calculate the weighted cost of capital is that we should use the fair value of the securities.
Answer:
Courts Distributors and Eastinghouse Corporation
Dispute over Contract Price
The two parties have a legal contract. The contract was established when Courts requested Eastinghouse to send the refrigerators and bill later.
The exact price for the contract is in dispute. This dispute can be resolved between the parties. Reference to the market price will help resolve the dispute, otherwise, the parties may seek alternative dispute resolutions, like litigation, mediation, or arbitration.
Explanation:
a) Data and Analysis:
Eastinghouse's invoice price for the refrigerators = $140,000
Courts' adopted market price = $120,000
b) Since Courts' reference to the price is with regard to the wholesale market price, it may be that Eastinghouse quoted the retail price instead. Since Courts is a distributor, it has the right to be charged a wholesaler's price and not a retailer's. Therefore, we can conclude that after due reference to the prevailing market price of similar refrigerators, the two parties may agree to a price of $120,000 or a little higher.
The total cost for this certain activity level can be calculated by substituting 4000 to the x of the equation given above,
y = 7000 + 1.8(4000)
y = 14200
Thus, the total cost of the activity level is $14,200.
Answer:
management has not explained its business purpose
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the firm is engaged in the new financial transaction that contains the material impact on the earnings so this represents that it could be come under the pre existed accounting standards.
Also everyone should be aware of the business purpose plus it is not established for changing off the financial statements
So it would be suspicious because the purpose of the business could not be explained
