Answer:
B. 21x + 40 ≤ 124
Step-by-step Explanation:
Maximum amount budgeted = $124 (this means they can't spend more than this)
x = number of people
Cost per head = $21
Given that Mr Walter already spent $40, which is part of the money budgeted, the number of people that can go canoeing cam be expressed with the following inequality:
21x + 40 ≤ 124
(note: the amount total to be spent will either be equal to or greater than $124, because it's the maximum amount budgeted for spending).
Answer:
The angles are 79.45, 59.02 and 41.53 degrees to the nearest hundredth.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have a triangle with sides of length 8.6, 5.8 and 7.5 feet.
Using the Cosine Rule to find the measure of the angle opposite the side of length 8.6 feet:
cos X = (8.6^2 - 5.8^2 - 7.5^2) / ( -2*5.8*7.5)
= 0.18310
X = 79.45 degrees.
We can now find another angle using the sine rule:
8.6 / sin 79.45 = 7.5/ sin Y
sin Y = (7.5 * sin 79.45) / 8.6
Y = 59.02 degrees
So the third angle = 180 - 79.45 - 59.02
= 41.53 degrees.
As there are multiple answers going with trial and error seems good in this case.
A
5.00 + 5.00 + 5.00 + 5.00 = 20.00
3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 = 31.5
20.00 + 31.5 = 51.5
B
5.00 + 5.00 + 5.00 + 5.00 = 20.00
3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 = 35.00
20.00 + 35.00 = 55.00
C
5.00 + 5.00 + 5.00 = 15.00
3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 + 3.50 = 31.5
15.00 + 31.5 =46.5
Knowing that for the first one all A,B, and C were wrong we can determine that D is the answer. But wait if I made one mistake and didn't understand if $156.5 is equivalent to $156.50 that would mean A is correct.
Always recheck your answers and good luck,
Jon
Answer:
And we can calculate the p value with the following probability taking in count the alternative hypothesis:
And for this case using a significance level of 
we see that the p value is larger than the significance level so then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion is less than 0.02
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we want to test the following system of hypothesis:
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis: 
The statistic for this case is given by:
(1)
And for this case we know that the statistic is given by:
And we can calculate the p value with the following probability taking in count the alternative hypothesis:
And for this case using a significance level of we see that the p value is larger than the significance level so then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion is less than 0.02
