Answer:
I think the second one should be the correct
Explanation:
Because the writer use to know the audience sometimes and they use it on their topic.
Answer:
A. A paradox is more of a contradiction than an affirmation.
B. No, a change in the environment would not likely be lethal to a highly adaptable species.
Explanation:
A. The official definition of a paradox, as provided by Merriam-Webster dictionary, is "a statement that is seemingly contradictory or opposed to common sense and yet is perhaps true". Therefore, it would be more of a contradiction because the things that are mentioned in them do not coincide. An example of a paradox would be the statement "There is no absolute truth". This is contradictory because you saying that there is no such thing as absolute truth yet you are also saying it definitively as if it were absolute truth. So, if there is no absolute truth, but the statement has an absolute truth claim, then the statement does not make sense and is a paradox.
B. If a species is highly adaptable, then it would be able to withstand any changes in the environment because it would adapt in each and every change. The changes in environment would not likely be lethal in this regard, and as a result, the species would not die off.
Answer:
First, it is important because...The functions of the High Court are to interpret and apply the law of Australia; to decide cases of special federal significance including challenges to the constitutional validity of laws and to hear appeals, by special leave, from Federal, State, and Territory courts.
Explanation:
The advantages of it are The doctrine of precedent. The doctrine of precedent is reliant on the existence of a court hierarchy. ...
Appeals. Court hierarchies allow for the hearing of appeals. ...
Locality. In every jurisdiction, there are more inferior courts (Magistrates and Local Courts) spread across a wider area. ...
Expertise.
CAN YOU MARK BRAINLIEST? I NEED TWO MORE TO RANK UP
Weaving Is One Of The Skills As Challenged Athena In a contest
