Answer:
$0 because an agreement to accept different performance in lieu of full payment of liquidated debt is binding.
Explanation:
Since there is an agreement between Amy, a baker, and her brother, she owes him $0.
At first, Amy gets a loan of $3,000 from her brother to pay for her dream home. She agrees to pay him back in one year, and that agreement was binding. During the time to pay back the loan, Amy offers to bake her brother's wedding cake instead of paying back the loan and her brother accepts. This has presented a new agreement that overrules the previous agreement. Now instead of paying back the $3,000, she would bake a wedding cake for him. This implies that the wedding cake is equal to $3,000.
Therefore, she owes him $0.
Based on the question provided above, there are no choices
provided and I have found a similar question that has its choices which are;
-
Use only complex sentences
-
Correct run-on sentences
-
Correct fragments
-
Use only simple sentences
-
Reduce sentence lengths
With the given choices, the correct answers are the
following;
-
Correct run-on sentences – run on sentences
should be corrected in order for the faulty sentences to be improved and revise
as they contain two or more main clause or independent clause in which are
being joined without any word to correct them and by this, it makes the readers
confused.
-
Correct fragments – fragments should be
corrected as these are sentences that are incomplete that makes the content of
an information to lose its value as the information is incomplete.
-
Reduce sentence lengths – it is best to reduce
sentence lengths so that the readers won’t find the reading material boring to
read at and in the same time, make it more easy and attractive to read
To keep every other branch in check if we had only one then they could go corrupt. (separation of power)
We can actually deduce here that the unintended consequences of an economic change that are not immediately identifiable but are felt only with time are known in economics as: D. Secondary effects.
<h3>What is unintended consequence?</h3>
Unintended consequence, as seen in social sciences are known to be the result or outcome that is gotten from a purposeful action which were not seen coming.
The options that complete the question are:
a. scarcity constraints.
b. marginal effects.
c. opportunity costs.
d. secondary effects
We can actually deduce here that such unintended consequences of an economic change that are not immediately identifiable but are felt only with time are known in economics are known to be secondary effects.
Learn more about unintended consequence on brainly.com/question/17228614
#SPJ1
I believe the answer is d., the federal budget.