I believe the answer is compound B may have a lower molecular weight compared to compound A.
At the same temperature, lighter particles of a compound have a higher average speeds than do heavier particles of another compound. Thus, particles of compound B are lighter than those of compound A and thus they have a higher average speed, hence evaporating faster compared to compound A.
No! That’s why they’re called theories. Most of them have a lot of facts to back it up however the theories themselves are either proven or just hypothetical.
Answer:
37.1 calories.
Approximately, 37.1 = 40 calories.
Explanation:
So, without mincing words let's dive straight into the solution to the question above.
We are given the following parameters which are going to help in solving this particular Question.
The mass of broccoli = 86g of broccoli, mass of carbohydrates present = 6g of carbohydrates, the mass of protein present = 2.6g of protein and the mass of fat present = 0.3g of fat.
Therefore, the nutritional energy content (in Calories) = (6 × 4) + (2.6 × 4) + (0.3 × 9) = 10.4 + 24 + 2.7 = 37.1
Hence, the nutritional energy content (in Calories) = 37.1 calories.
Approximately, 37.1 = 40 calories.
It really depends on the 'type' of rock it is. By this I mean whether it's impermeable or permeable. Impermeable rocks don't allow water through and permeable rocks do. It has to do with how 'porous' a rock is: how many openings it has and how spaced apart are its particles are. Sandstone is permeable and Shale impermeable.