Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes =
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes =
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.
Answer: the correct answer is letter D. the nominal interest rate is the stated interest rate whereas the real interest rate is the nominal interest rate minus the inflation rate.
Explanation: in financial maths when you speak about "real" rates you should consider the inflation impact.
Answer:
Downward sloping; horizontal line; demand; large number of competitors
Explanation:
A monopoly is a market structure where there is only a single firm in the market. This firm is a price maker. It can charge whatever price it wants, but the consumers will demand more at a lower price.
That is why the demand curve of a monopoly is downward sloping and the same as the market demand curve.
A perfectly competitive market refers to the market structure where there is a large number of buyers and sellers. These firms are price takers. They face a horizontal line demand curve. This is because of a large number of competitors producing homogenous products. So if a firm raises its prices the consumers will move to the firm at a lower price.
The market demand curve though is downward sloping.
Answer:
The answer is: E) As long as the law affects commerce among the states, or interstate commerce, in some way, the regulation is generally constitutional.
Explanation:
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution of the US:
[The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.
Generally speaking, Congress can pass laws that affect trade (either allow or restrict trade) between states, between nations or with Native American Tribes. It also includes laws about navigable waters, e.g. rivers and oceans.