The compound sentence is letter C: She was disappointed, but she accepted second prize with grace.
Sentence structures could be simple (one independent clause), compound (two independent clause with coordinating conjunction), complex (a subordinate & independent clause) and compound-complex sentences (subordinate & two independent clause). These include clauses, conjunctions, coherence and balance and even to the number of words you use in your subject and predicate. The benefit of complex or compound sentences is that it could give you more explanation on the subject or topic of the sentence. This gives you a much more understanding on what the sentence is trying to portray or to message to give.
Answer:
my guy wants me to do his entire homework. wt.f
Explanation:
Answer:
86.7%.
Explanation:
Considering the diagram, the path of the tip of the blades is a circle.
Hence, determine the circumference of the circle.
C = 2πr = 2π * 3 ft = 6π ft.
Then determine how long the blade edges are all together.
6 in * 5 blades = 30 inches
Therefore, to determine the fraction of the circumference of 30 inches, convert circumference to inches
6π ft * (12 in ÷ 1 ft) = 72π in.
Hence, the probability of Gerald’s randomly timed shot hitting a blade of the windmill
=> 30 ÷ 72π
=> 30 ÷ [72 * (22/7)]
= 13.3%.
Finally, the probability of his shot getting past the blades is then 100 – 13.3 = 86.7%.
This is a thought-provoking letter written by Kurt Vonnegut opposing the idea of burning books of young children, in view of transforming the system of education in America.
Explanation:
In this letter, Vonnegut starts telling audience/readers the ideas that can have a negative effect, not only on the target person/individual, but also on a wider range because of its effect being new and historic.
Though in view of a change, Vonnegut argues that this act of burning books is not what we all should accept. In Paragraphs 7 and 8, when Vonnegut explains about how people feel it is their right to decide what their children must read, the author explains to them that it is true but doing that in an un-American way - harsh, impractical, ignorant manner can cause a negative impact for them.
In the next point of argument, author talks about how people/nations who didn't read books, didn't let ideas emerge among people fought wars. They created destruction all over world. The author clearly states that people/nations who read books have been a part of development, improvement and liberation.
Their parents or their willing to do anything to be with each other
