Answer:
The theoretical probability of rolling a number smaller than a 3 is __1/3_____because this is what__we expect to happen____ . The experimental probability of rolling a number smaller than a 3 is __1/4____ because this is what___actually happened____
Step-by-step explanation:
The experimental probability is
P (<3) = ( getting a one or 2)/ number of times that he rolled
He rolled a one or a two 2 times of the 8 times rolled
= 2/8 = 1/4
Theoretical probability is what we expect happen
P (<3) = (getting a one or two) / 6
= 2/6 = 1/3
The theoretical probability of rolling a number smaller than a 3 is __1/3_____because this is what__we expect to happen____ . The experimental probability of rolling a number smaller than a 3 is __1/4____ because this is what___actually happened____
Answer:
74
Step-by-step explanation:
60,000 + 14,000
ANS 14%
ANSWER: 74
Answer:
The classmate's only error is that the slope of the parallel line should be 3 aswell.
Step-by-step explanation:
Parallel lines always have the same slope to each other
Answer:
=5.385 (must look at the requirement of the test as how many decimal...)
Step-by-step explanation:
the squared is equal to 29 means area=29
square has four side equal.
Area=side * side
Answer: m=−3
Step-by-step explanation: −40−2(3m+1/2)=7m−2
−40+(−2)(3m)+(−2)(1/2)=7m+−2
−40+−6m+−1=7m+−2
(−6m)+(−40+−1)=7m−2
−6m+−41=7m−2
−6m−41−7m=7m−2−7m
−13m−41+41=−2+41
−13m/−13=39/−13
m=−3
What mistake I guess Keith did make is he subtracted 2 from -39 which equaled to -37 which caused him divide -37 by 13 when it should have been 39 divided by 13 because he should have left 39 alone and not have subtracted 2 from it also it should not have been negative basically what I'm trying to say is that he did his division and subtraction wrong.