How did Countee Cullen and James Baldwin differ in their criticism of Hughes's work?

English

1 answer:

o-na [289]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Cullen claimed that Hughes' writing focused on American life, but ignored the African heritage of African Americans and believed that this was a disservice. Baldwin, on the other hand, circled the simple language adopted by Hughes in his poems, which, according to Baldwin, presented weak, irrelevant and meaningless agendas.

Explanation:

Cullen, Baldwin and hughes were American writers very committed to the causes of civil rights and the difficulties that African-Americans suffered in a racist and prejudiced American society. Although both authors used the same themes, they approached them in different ways and with different approaches, which meant that they often did not agree with each other's work and form of writing, which generated many literary criticisms from each other.

You might be interested in

“The time travelers guide to Elizabethan England”. Which details gives implicit information about the modern views of the Elizab

grigory [225]

A wide flat field is "finer” than rugged terrain for it can be tilled easily to produce wheat and so represents good white bread. A small thatched cottage, which a modern viewer might consider pretty, will be considered unattractive by an Elizabethan traveler, for cottagers are generally poor

8 0

2 years ago

What type of wordplay does the author use in the passage?

Anna71 [15]

Homophobe

Hope this helps :))

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which choice correctly orders the events in Jamal’s story?

Lorico [155]

JaMaL aTe My ChEeTos

There isnt any choices.