1) 201.6 ounces. (16 ounces in 1 lb)
2) 3090 grams (1000g in 1 kg)
3)8820 in (36in in 1 yd)
PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIEST
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
810 is 100 times the size of 0.81
Answer: the answer is 7
Step-by-step explanation: the lowest number is 3 and the biggest one is 10 so you substract 10-3 and you get 7