Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
Solve for x+y=10
6x+35y=118
Step-by-step explanation:
I would solve it for you but my calculator isn't working rn. You could also use a picture calculator and it will give you a more in depth explanation. Hope this helps!
Answer:
The answer is below
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the number of small hat purchased, y represent the number of medium hat purchased and z represent the number of large hat purchased.
Since a total of 47 hats where purchased, hence:
x + y + z = 47 (1)
Also, he spent a total of $302, hence:
5.5x + 6y + 7z = 302 (2)
He purchases three times as many medium hats as small hats, hence:
y = 3x
-x + 3y = 0 (3)
Represent equations 1, 2 and 3 in matrix form gives:
Therefore he purchases 6 small hats, 18 medium hats and 23 large hats
Answer:
Simplifying
T = C(9 + AB) * forB
Reorder the terms for easier multiplication:
T = C * forB(9 + AB)
Multiply C * forB
T = forBC(9 + AB)
T = (9 * forBC + AB * forBC)
Reorder the terms:
T = (forAB2C + 9forBC)
T = (forAB2C + 9forBC)
Solving
T = forAB2C + 9forBC
Solving for variable 'T'.
Move all terms containing T to the left, all other terms to the right.
Simplifying
T = forAB2C + 9forBC
Step-by-step explanation:
Simplifying
T = C(9 + AB) * forB
Reorder the terms for easier multiplication:
T = C * forB(9 + AB)
Multiply C * forB
T = forBC(9 + AB)
T = (9 * forBC + AB * forBC)
Reorder the terms:
Answer
Rise from the blue dot run to the red dot. Rise over run.
Step-by-step explanation:
1/8 would be your answer