Answer:
Is this question still open? I can try.
Explanation:
Answer:
SHORT VERSION: There is no smoke without fire is a proverb or saying which explains about some rumours or assumptions.
Above saying explains that as smoke won't be liberated unless there is presence of fire any rumor or news wont get spread without any initiative.
So behind any rumor the will be a chance of truth in most of the cases.
LONGER VERSION: As the saying goes, "there's no smoke without fire", it is rue to say that there is always some truth to whatever has bee implied. This is used majorly in the case of spreading rumors or some events though without the presence of any evidence to prove it.
When anything is implied, but there is no proof whatsoever, it is safe to assume that there is some truth to whatever has been implied. Once a person says something like an accusation or even a false rumor or implication, there must be some truth behind it for the rumor to start. If someone implied that he heard someone tell about an upcoming market fair, it can be implied that he got the information from somewhere else or he wouldn't have just come up with the knowledge by himself. he heard someone say something about it and then decided to tell someone else and thus help spread the information. Though he did not possess any evidence or proof of the fair, there is some truth behind it. Just like smoke cannot come or be made by itself and requires a fire to get smoke, there is always some truth behind any accusation or rumor.
Explanation:
The independent clause in the sentence is "we returned it." This is the answer because if you say the sentence alone it makes since and it does not need another sentence to support it. Furthermore, the dependent clause in that sentence is "Because the shirt had a tear,". This does not express a reasoning for the shirt having a tear. But, "we returned it", has a subject and a verb. "we" is the subject, and the action of returning is the verb. I hope this has been helpful. : )
Argumentative and discussion essays are indeed very commonly used by university students in their assignments.
Argumentative essays involve writing about a particular issue and then taking a position/ stance on that issue. The writer will then try to prove that their stance is right by laying forward evidence based facts and opinions to show that indeed, their stance is correct.
Discussion essays on the other hand are all about writing about as much of an issue as possible. The goal is to discuss it at length so that the reader will be more knowledgeable of the issue as a result.
The differences between a discussion and an argumentative essay are:
- Discussion essay talks about a topic in general while an argumentative one focuses on a particular aspect and defends it
- A discussion essay is neutral whereas an argumentative one is biased
In conclusion, both these essay styles may be different but they are very useful to students as they can help convey different aspects of an issue.
<em>More information is available at brainly.com/question/1443709.</em>
