This question is incomplete. The complete answer is:
Read the excerpt from Theodore Dreiser’s “My Brother Paul.” What narrative point of view does Dreiser use in this excerpt from the story?
"I had not seen my brother in three or four days, but after I had strolled a block or two up Broadway I encountered him. I have always thought that he had kept an eye on me and had really followed me; was looking, in short, to see what I would do As usual he was most smartly and comfortably dressed."
A. Second person
B. Third-person limited
C. First person
D. Third-person omniscient
The correct answer is C. First person.
Explanation
Explanation
In the narrative field, the first person refers to how one of the characters tells the story from his point of view. In this mode, the subjects I (singular) and we (plural) are used. According to the above, the previous fragment is written in the first person because whoever tells the story speaks of himself by saying "I had not seen my brother in three or four days ". According to the above, the correct answer is C. First person.
Orestes' is Agamemnon´s son
Answer:
1. This is an expository article. This can be seen through the author's attempt to provide evidence to readers based on scientific and confirmed analyzes, where he literally exposes the topic in question, explaining it impartially and informing the reader.
2. The central idea is to expose the certainty that some Puritans have that they still exist and are influential in America, being part of American society.
3. To justify this perception of the Puritans, Hudson shows how the Puritans justify that many cultural points and customs present in America today are based on Puritan habits.
4. To explain a specific idea about Puritans believing they are still influential today, Hutson shows that many ideas from influential Puritans like Martin Luther and John Calvin are currently being encouraged, to confirm this, he shows that research has already been done with students from two universities that prove that the concepts of these two men are still taken seriously within society. I do not fully agree with Hutson's view because the research he cites in the article only represents a very small part of the population, which is not enough to represent American society.
Explanation:
please mark me brainliest.
A and d I believe but I'm not sure
Answer:
Ví dụ: Họ đã chiến đấu như những con mèo và con chó! ... Ví dụ: Hai chị em đánh nhau như chó với mèo! Phép ẩn dụ . So sánh hai thứ không giống nhau KHÔNG sử dụng các từ "như" hoặc "như."
Explanation:
