The equation would just be x=8 since the x of both points is 8.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Without a second equation relating x and y, we can solve 3x - 1/2y = 2 ONLY for x in terms of y or for y in terms of x:
x in terms of y: Multiply all three terms of 3x - 1/2y = 2 by 2, to eliminate the fraction: 6x - y = 4. Now add y to both sides to isolate 6x: 6x = 4 + y.
Last, divide both sides by 6 to isolate x:
x = (4 + y)/6
y in terms of x:
y = 6x - 4
If you want a numerical solution, please provide another equation in x and y and solve the resulting system.
11 miles / 20 miles =.55
.55 x 100 = 55%
11/20 is the proportion and you multiply by 100 to gey a percent
another way to solve is
11/20 x 5/5 = 55/100 = 55%
you multiply by 5/5 because it is equal to one and it makes the denominator equal to 100 it also follows the rule that whatever you do to the top you must do with the bottom
Yes it is true that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars because null hypothesis is rejected.
Given among 2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticut trucks, 45 had only rear license plates.
let be the probability that commercial cars have rear license plates and be the probability that connected trucks have rear license plates.
Cars Trucks Total
Total 2049 334 2383
x 239 45 284
p 0.1166 0.1347 0.1191
α=0.05
Hypothesis will be :
It is a left tailed test at 0.05 significance.
Standard errors of p=
=
=
=0.0066
Test statistic Z=p difference/standard error
=(0.1166-0.1347)/0.0066
=-0.0181/0.0061
=-2.967
p value=0.001505<5%
Since p is less than 5% we reject null hypothesis.
We cannot calculate standard deviation so we cannot calculate confidence interval.
Hence there is statistical evidence at 5% significance level to support that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars.
Learn more about z test at brainly.com/question/14453510
#SPJ4