Answer:
-Say nothing to his co-workers since this was a private conversation and he could lose his job if his boss found out he was spreading sensitive company information
Explanation:
Since in the situation it is mentioned that Mark accidentally heard a confidential phone conversation in which the possibility of layoff in the sales division would be discussed he is not in danger but some of his friends are the sales representatives so mark would not tell anyone as it is a private conversation and he could lose the job if the boss knows that the information is spread by mark
Therefore the second option is correct
Answer:
(D) is the same and output is lower than in the original long-run equilibrium.
Explanation:
In the long term the prices are flexible. They adapt to the new situation of a decrease in the demand. This is consistent with with a lower output, consecuences of the decreasing in the demand.
Answer:
D. is imperfectly competitive, but not all imperfectly competitive markets are monopolistically competitive.
Explanation:
Monopolistic competition may be seen as a variety of competition that determine the characteristics of variety of industries that are familiar to consumers in their day-to-day lives. For instance, restaurants, hair salons, clothing, and consumer electronics are all monopolistic competitive market but not all imperfectly competitive markets are monopolistically competitive.
Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.
Answer:
B. $1673920
Explanation:
First calculate Total loss
$2000000 loss from disposal of a component of the business and loss of $92400 from strike by the employees of a supplier
$2000000 + $92400 = $2,092,400
20% of the loss =
20% × $2,092,400
= $418,480
Therefore the effect of these events and transactions on 2020 net income net of tax would = Total loss - 20% of total loss
$2,092,400 - $418,480
= $1,673,920
