Answer:
c. Deductive, analogy
Explanation:
In this scenario, the argument being made would be classified as a deductive analogy. An analogy basically compares two things together in order to explain an idea, most of the time these two things have something in common that allows that idea to be better understood. In this scenario, they are comparing a rabid dog and an unexploded bomb. Since the unexploded bomb is the object that the rabid dog is being compared to it would be considered the conclusion, and since the conclusion is being applied first in the second part of the argument you are therefore using deductive logic.
Answer:
They more than likely wanted the play to last longer, and/or wanted a more dramatic effect. They add more drama but beside that not much. I think it personally had more impact as it drove the narrative and you felt more from the scenes
Explanation:
Answer:
The function of the underlined noun clause is direct object.
Explanation:
A noun clause is a dependent clause that acts as a noun. That is, they can act as subjects, direct objects, indirect objects, predicate nominatives, or objects of a preposition. In this case, the noun clause is "whatever the cafeteria staff has decided to cook" and it functions as the direct object of the transitive verb <em>to eat. </em>
Im pretty sure yall have lost yalls minds -lyndon b johnson
