Answer: The explanation is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The interpretation of 95% confidence interval for population mean is that "A person can be 95% sure that the true population mean lies in it."
Given : The admissions director from Big City University found that (107.8, 116.2) is a 95% confidence interval for the mean IQ score of all freshmen.
Interpretation: The admissions director can be 95% sure that the true population mean IQ score of all freshmen lies in (107.8, 116.2).
i.e. There is a 95% probability (chance) that the interval from 107.8 to 116.2 contains μ.
Hence, the explanation is absolutely "correct" .
Im failing math but passing all others im sorry lol
The percentage of the offspring that will have atatched earlobes as the dominant trait, is: 50%.
What is a Dominant Trait?
A dominant trait surpresses a recessive trait, and expresses itself. The allele of a dominant trait is usally denoted using capital letters.
Given the following traits:
A - attached earlobes (dominant allele)
a - unattached earlobes (recessive allele)
A cross between Aa and aa is shown in the image attached below.
The offspring having attached earlobes = 2 Aa = 50%.
50% of the osspring will have attached earlobes.
Learn more about dominant trait on:
brainly.com/question/16616523
Answer:
I'm assuming it would be 3 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
It would be 3 hours because after three hours, the candle that can only burn for 3 hours will have burned out. This leaves the candles that can burn for 4 and 5 hours. I guess if you want to get really specific you could say 3 hours and 59 minutes but I'm not totally sure how your teacher wants the answer
The correct answer is C. So, lets go first to the equations that determine the volume of these solids. For the cylinder, that is simple; pi*r*r*h where r is the radius, h is the height and pi is the constant 3.14. For the cone, it is not easy to derive but one gets that the formula is:
.
We notice thus that
. That holds irrespective of their radius or height; we only need to know that the heights and radii of the two objects are the same. Now, we have thus that:
.
We can check if this holds for Jared's statement; 1178/4712=0.25=1/4. So, it does not hold and thus Jared's statement is incorrect.