I thought it was (d) but I might be wrong
Well first off, Mendel’s law of segregation states that individuals possess two alleles and a parent passes only one allele to his/her offspring. Mendel’s law of independent assortment states the inheritance of one pair of factors (genes) is independent of the inheritance of the other pair. Now Mendel discovered this through his little experiment with the pea plants that showed certain traits through a particular pattern, subsequently becoming the foundation of modern genetics and heredity.
Livestock producers and breeders rank livestock on their ability to produce high quality, efficient breeding animals and market-worthy <u>offspring</u>.
To be able to effectively evaluate breeding and market animals is of vital economic importance for the animal markets. The same traits used to evaluate <u>high-grade slaughter animals</u> are also important in the <u>grading </u>of <u>breeding stock</u>.
When we judge livestock we classify them as:
- Superior livestock
- Average livestock
- Inferior livestock
We are looking for the most desirable traits to fit our particular market and genetic needs. The "Livestock Judging Manual" indicates that some of the most prevalent traits necessary to score a better rating are:
- <em>Live weight</em>
- <em>Fat depth</em>
- Muscling
and many more. The most important of which is muscling given that an animal with more muscle will produce more desirable meat for the average consumer, and therefore can be sold at higher prices.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/17128434?referrer=searchResults
Answer: probably Nerve cells (for some)
Explanation: Nerve cells are also called neurons. Their function is to communicate with other neurons and the body. The adaptations of a nerve cell are dendrites with receptor proteins, an axon, myelin, synaptic terminals and neurotransmitters.
The missing part of the question is as follows:
Phrase indicates a limit to the scientific accuracy of the experiment?
Answer:
The correct answer is - a sample size of 300 people.
Explanation:
In the given research Marcus developed a drug that is already 200,000 people taking the drug, and the scientist takes sample size of only 300 people for the experiment.
The sample is very small as compared to the total population who participated in the research. A sample size of 300 people is very small compared to 200,000 people. Such a small sample size will not give the proper idea and any effective result, there would be chances to miss some aspect or effect of the drug to be missed, so, this can be the limiting factor to the experiment.
