Based on the information given, the corporate bond will be recommended for Mr. Brown while the municipal bond will be recommended for Mr Black.
<u>Mr Brown:</u>
The after-yield tax on corporate bonds will be:
= Before tax yield × (1 - tax rate)
= 4% × (1 - 0.10)
= 3.60%
After tax yield on municipal bond will be:
= 3.5% × 1 = 3.5%
The corporate bond is recommended.
For <u>Mr. Black</u>
The after-yield tax on corporate bonds will be:
= 4% × (1 - 0.35)
= 2.60%
The after-yield tax on municipal bonds will be:
= 3.5% × 1
= 3.5%
Therefore, the municipal bond is recommended.
Red related link on:
brainly.com/question/25379770
Answer: Market Efficiency
Explanation:
It is important that the Government as a regulator should not get involved in acts that would protect individual institutions from failure because that would defeat the whole purpose of a competitive industry.
If a government is known to directly involve itself in the protection of institutions from failure, efficiency in institutions may become low because of the lack of fear of failure as companies believe that should they run into bad times, they will simply be bailed out by the government so there is no need for them to maintain a competitive edge.
This can lead to a situation where we have companies performing sub optimally in an economy which can only act to reduce the Economic growth of a country.
Government institutions usually have such backing and in a lot of countries are prone to failure. Look at the Bamangwato Concessions Limited (BCL) mine in Botswana for instance that kept failing and refusing to improve it's efficiency because they could always run back to the government for a bailout. Their position eventually became so untenable that bankruptcy was the only option.
Answer:
The firm wins because these actions are not illegal.
Explanation:
The laws that prohibit non physical harassment at work are:
- Title VII which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, etc.
- ADEA which protects people who are older than 40 years old against discrimination based on their age.
Parker should first address this issue with the company and see how it can work out. It is very difficult for someone to win a lawsuit if they don't fall under any protected category. In this case, Parker's colleagues are jealous because he is simply smarter and that is the reason why they are harassing him. I guess that if he can prove with a psychiatrist report that the continuous harassment is affecting his well being, he might have a chance.
I knew a case from first hand about a very beautiful woman who had two careers and was very smart and efficient. She wasn't harassed by men, most men at the office only starred at her and wouldn't dare to talk to her. She was harassed by other women that were jealous about her beauty and the fact that she was probably the smartest person around. Besides everybody knowing that the other women were jealous, and everyone making jokes about who was most jealous, she couldn't do anything about it. She ended up quitting the job and to be honest her life got much better at another place. Sometimes an organization's culture is managed by one or two individuals, and if they feel threatened by someone else, they may act in a very childish way and the rest follows.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": can be biological, psychological, or social.
Explanation:
Risk factors can determine future outcomes and most likely are negatives. Those outcomes are the results of biological, psychological and social influences. On the other hand, protective factors are characteristics that lower the possibility that the outcome will be negative. Both risk and protective outcomes do not change over time.
