Answer:
B. Must be written to be enforceable
Explanation:
In the United state, sale of personal property for $500 or more must be written to be enforceable. These kind of contracts are said to be within the statute of fraud.
These types of contracts are called Sales contracts which is an agreement between the buyer and seller. For the amount of money involved, a written contract provides security and peace to the mind of all those involved in the contract, hence why deals above $500 must be written to be enforceable.
C. Portobello, is a good example of a mushroom with a meat like texture.
Answer: Fundamental attributional error.
Explanation:
Frank is making a fundamental attributional error when judging the cause of Anna's inability to meet sales target. Frank is blaming her failure based on her character rather than on the real reason which is the attractive sales offer of their competitors. Fundamental attributional error is an error which arises from judging a person's action based on their character without considering other possible external causes.
Answer:
Economic models often vary greatly in assumptions and simplifications.
Explanation:
Most models in Classical Economics are based on a lot of generalizations and simplifications, that intend to model the behavior of the situations of the real world but often fail to encompass all the intricacies and complications that even most straightforward situations present. These simplifications help the Economists figure out the mathematical laws that are governing the real world economic systems. Therefore making the economic modeling a simpler process.
Classic economics implies three basic assumptions:
1- People behave rationally in any situation.
2- Firms and individual want to maximize profit and utility
3- People act independently based on available information.
Answer:
the three of them could be held personally liable:
- I. John
- II. John's manager
- III. The CEO, who in this specific case we assume could have prevented the crime.
Explanation:
John committed forgery and possibly fraud by forging clients' signatures on documents held by the company. His boss ordered him to do so, so he is also responsible for John's actions. John can even try to put all the blame on his boss alleging that he was forced to forge the signatures. The CEO of the firm is also responsible because the forged documents had to serve someone's illegal purposes, and the CEO probably was the one that needed them or knew about what was going on and didn't do anything to stop it.
