I the second one is more risky I'm not really that good at business
Answer:
The most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Explanation:
When there isn't a statute, the buyer bears the risk of loss when property subject to a contract for sale is destroyed without fault of any party prior to the date specified for closing. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the buyer must pay the contract price even if the property is damaged by fire.
The inn was burned down in this case after the landowner and the buyer signed a contract for the sale of the property, but before the closing date. The contract appears to be silent on the risk of loss, and no appropriate statute exists. As a result of the common law rule, the buyer bears the risk of loss. Therefore, the landowner has the right to particular execution of the contract, which implies that the entire stipulated contract price must be paid by the buyer.
Regardless of the property's drop in worth owing to the fire, the $1 million contract price must be paid by the buyer because he bears the risk of loss.
Therefore, the most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Answer:
27%
Explanation:
The actual rate being charge on these loans is the effective annual rate and the formula to calculate it is:
i=(1+(r/m))^m−1
i= effective annual rate
r= interest rate in decimal form=0.24
m=number of compounding periods per year= 52 (a year has 52 weeks).
i=(1+(0.24/52))^52-1
i=1.27-1
i=0.27
According to this, the answer is that the actual rate being charge on these loans is 27%.
The correct question should be:
Companies facing the challenge of setting prices for the first time can choose between two board strategies; marketing-penetration pricing and _______ pricing.
Answer: Market Skimming pricing.
Explanation:
A company with a product new to the market can either choose to use the market penetration pricing or the market skimming pricing.
The market penetration pricing works best in a market with a lot of competition. The penetration pricing is a kind of pricing a company uses where the price of it's Products are set to be very low to attract price-sensitive consumers and still make profit.
The market skimming pricing on the other hand is a price setting method where a high entry price is set for a new product and then subsequently reduced with increase in market competition.
Answera dnd Explanation:
A. The incentive conflict in principal-agent relationship as it concerns venture capitalism is conflict between venture capitalists who are the principals and the managers of the business investment who are the agents. The conflict is that venture capitalists are put to increase value of their investment and make profit while salaried managers are only out to feel their pockets through their managerial role in the company as they do not have an interest in the company and are unaffected by the loss or failure of the company. This is known as the principal agent moral hazard issue in venture capitalism
B. By managers maintaining some ownership in the company, there us reduced conflict as managers now see a reason to make sure company succeeds since they have an interest
Venture capitalists aim to have a seat in the board to make sure managers do not take bad decisions since they are able to veto such decisions
