Yes, Sliding friction opposes the movement of the book, slowing it down.sliding That's the 'kinetic' kind.. According to Newton's second law, F=ma. That is, the bear's acceleration should be proportional to the total force acting on the bear. As the bear's velocity is constant, its acceleration is zero. Therefore, the total Force acting on the bear is zero. Thus, the friction has to be equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the bear's weight. As W=mg, we get that its weight is <span>9.8*400=3,920 Newton. Thus, the friction acting on the bear is 3,920 Newton</span>
Answer:
A) = 1.44 kg m², B) moment of inertia must increase
Explanation:
The moment of inertia is defined by
I = ∫ r² dm
For figures with symmetry it is tabulated, in the case of a cylinder the moment of inertia with respect to a vertical axis is
I = ½ m R²
A very useful theorem is the parallel axis theorem that states that the moment of inertia with respect to another axis parallel to the center of mass is
I = + m D²
Let's apply these equations to our case
The moment of inertia is a scalar quantity, so we can add the moment of inertia of the body and both arms
= + 2
= ½ M R²
The total mass is 64 kg, 1/8 corresponds to the arms and the rest to the body
M = 7/8 m total
M = 7/8 64
M = 56 kg
The mass of the arms is
m’= 1/8 m total
m’= 1/8 64
m’= 8 kg
As it has two arms the mass of each arm is half
m = ½ m ’
m = 4 kg
The arms are very thin, we will approximate them as a particle
= M D²
Let's write the equation
= ½ M R² + 2 (m D²)
Let's calculate
= ½ 56 0.20² + 2 4 0.20²
= 1.12 + 0.32
= 1.44 kg m²
b) if you separate the arms from the body, the distance D increases quadratically, so the moment of inertia must increase
Answer:
Yes, it is reasonable to neglect it.
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, a single molecule of oxygen weights 32 g (diatomic oxygen) thus, the mass of kilograms is (consider Avogadro's number):
After that, we compute the potential energy 1.00 m above the reference point:
Then, we compute the average kinetic energy at the specified temperature:
Whereas stands for the Avogadro's number for which we have:
In such a way, since the average kinetic energy energy is about 12000 times higher than the potential energy, it turns out reasonable to neglect the potential energy.
Regards.
Answer:
Yes , it is possible for two different atoms of carbon to have different numbers of neutrons in their nuclei .
Explanation:
Isotopes -
Atoms of the element with same number of the electrons and protons , but differ in the number of neutrons , are called as the isotopes .
The isotopes of the element have the same number of protons and electrons , hence have the same chemical and physical properties .
Many isotopes occurs naturally .
In case of Carbon ,
Carbon too have isotopes ,
i.e.
Carbon - 13 and Carbon - 14
carbon - 13 , have seven neutrons
Carbon - 14 , have eight neutrons .
The cube has 6 equal, square, foil faces. The mass of foil for each face is (380/6) milligrams.
The surface area of each piece is (380)/(6•11) cm^2.
The length of each side of the piece is √(380/6•11) cm
That's about 2.4 cm .
It's a cute little foil cube, just under 1-inch each way.