Answer:
Crash the schedule.
Explanation:
Fast-track can complete the task earlier but takes more money. Assign more experienced people will cost the management more money. Cut scope reduces the project requirement and finishes the task earlier. Therefore, options A B and D can not be the answer.
Crash the schedule (option C) is the answer because it allocates enough resources to complete the task earlier without spending more money.
Answer:
Void
Explanation:
Void is the term of law, which is defined as the contract is not valid currently, and the parties of the contract are not held to its terms. The void contract is the one which is generally unenforceable.
The contract could be void because of many reasons like the contract need one party to perform that act which is impossible or in that case, where one party is not mentally incompetent.
So, in this case, the contract is most likely to be void as the contract with the party who is mentally incompetent, though the party has not been adjudged through court.
Answer:
Fred's seniority is a good defense for Grange
Explanation:
Based on the situation at hand and the details provided within the question it can be said that in Ellen’s suit against Grange for discrimination, most likely Fred's seniority is a good defense for Grange. Since Fred has been working at Grange Storage for a long time then Fred also has a right to claim that opening for himself.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Over 6,000 people that what the answer is