Choose the best answer:
Review the argument.
Claim #1: David likes peanut butter.
Claim #2: Some people who like peanut butter are jk word.
Conclusion: David is a jk word.
Which best identifies an error in the relevance of this argument?
A preference for or against peanut butter is not a valid way to evaluate an individual's personality.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
B. between any two characters.
Explanation:
That is answer I hope its help
If Mathilde Loisel did not lose the necklace nothing would have changed for her. She would have gone on being poor and miserable, longing for more.