Answer:
A. When two clauses are joined by a semicolon, they can usually be separated into two sentences.
Explanation:
A semicolon (;) is used to join two independent sentences into one written sentence. This semicolon is used when the two sentences are seen to be closely related to be separated by the use of a full stop. Also, it is used when there is no connecting word that require the use of comma.
But in actual sense, a semicolon can be replaced by a full stop thereby forming two different sentences.
The two clauses joined by a semicolon can be separated into two sentences.
One aspect of the article that was not discussed in detail was What Hector thinks about her opponents.
<h3>What did the article on Hector speak on?</h3>
We found out about the reason why some opponents don't support Hector which was that she was young.
We also found out how she had impacted her community. We did not however find out what she thought of her opponents because the article focused on her reasons for running.
Find out more on analyzing articles at brainly.com/question/1542515.
#SPJ1
1. Be your child's role model.
Whatever you do,your child will follow you.
2. Find fun ways to play outdoor games.
If s/he likes video games, make the outdoor game like a video game.
Answer:
Mrs. Hutchinson really wanted to stop being trapped in a world where she couldn't change anything, where the Lottery was something as natural as day or night, and she was already tired of being a woman who always struggled to fit into that society. She didn't want to follow the rules, but she was a rebellious person inside, and perhaps for her the only way to escape was to die. Although she seems abnegated and peaceful, she actually thinks that the Lottery is unfair and even its late the Lotttery's day. Tess Hutchinson wants to end all that, even dying. It is also logical to think that she succeeded.
Explanation:
When writing a persuasive essay (or giving a persuasive speech) the speaker should tell them what you're going to tell them, tell them, then tell them what you told them. Also the speaker should present the opposite viewpoint and then disprove that point with their point
I would go with the last one but I’m not a 100% sure. :)