Answer and Explanation:
Respected Sir,
Sub: Absorption costing to analyze product costs and subsequent cost-volume-profit decisions
As per your requirement please find the explanation below:
Absorption costing is a process by which we add part of the fixed overhead to the production expense of the goods. If we do on a per-unit basis. Here we will compute by dividing the fixed costs by the number of units that we built and sold over the era. Whereas Variable costing includes fixed overhead as a lump sum instead of a per-unit price.
Under this process, all your variable costs like equipment, raw materials, and shipping are included. We will add the maximum fixed overhead costs for the duration. Such costs are not calculated on a per-unit basis. Rather than we deduct them as a lump-sum expense from your income amount.
Variable costing is really useful as it reveals the earnings after all the expenses are paid for the accounting period. While you would not have earned revenue for the goods we purchased as some may be in the inventory, we are showing you have paid all of your expenses for the time. We have excess revenue when you actually sell the finished goods in the warehouse.
The absorption approach is not all that effective as absorption costing will inflate the income figures excessively in any given span of accounting. Since you're not going to subtract any of your fixed costs as we did not sell any of us produced goods, our profit and loss report doesn't reflect the maximum expenses you've had for the time. Therefore, these results may mislead us when our profitability is analyzed.
Regards
ABC
What is the product that you want to find where it comes from?
Answer:
$9,840
Explanation:
In this question, we have to take the difference between the payment for S corporation and the C corporation
If Military Gear Inc is a C corporation, then the payment would be
= Ordinary income × marginal tax rate
= $84,000 × 24%
= $20,160
And, if Military Gear Inc is a S corporation, then the payment would be
= (Ordinary income - net effect) × marginal tax rate
= ($84,000 - $41,000) × 24%
= $43,000 × 24%
= $10,320
The net effect would be
= $159,000 - $118,000
= $41,000
The net payment would be
= $20,160 - $10,320
= $9,840
Answer:
a. Apply for a larger loan amount.
Explanation:
In the case when the loan is re-applied after rejecting so if we applying for a larger loan should be rejected even quickly. As if the financial insitution found that the smaller amount loan is been rejected so application made for larger amount of loan should not be helped out for approve. Also there is proper tracking of loans with regard to the customer names
Hence, the option a is correct
