Answer:
budgeted costs for direct materials
budgeted direct manufacturing labor
budgeted manufacturing overhead
Explanation:
Direct materials costs are $4.00 per pool cue.
Direct manufacturing labor is $6.00 per pool cue.
Manufacturing overhead is $0.84 per pool cue.
total budgeted direct materials = 22,000 x $4 = $88,000
total budgeted direct labor = 22,000 x $6 = $132,000
total budgeted manufacturing overhead = 22,000 x $0.84 = $18,480
The information about the beginning and ending inventories is not relevant to this question since it only deals with budgeted or estimated costs which may or may not differ from actual costs.
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Expert power is a function of the amount of knowledge one possesses relative to the rest of the members of a group.
Answer:
D, Flint can simply write ot the SEC to voice his concerns.
Explanation:
Since Flint does not have a case that warrants a court challenge but rather an observation, Flint can simply write to the SEC to intimate them about his observations and/or findings, as well as let the SEC know the position of his company on the rule being proposed by it.
Cheers.
