Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
let : x The length and y the width you have this system :
xy =60....(1)
x = y+10...(2)
put the value for x in (1): (y+10)y =60
the quadratic equation is : y² +10y - 60 = 0
Δ =b² - 4ac a = 1 b= 10 c= - 60
Δ =10² - 4(1)(-60) = 324 =18²
y 1 = (-10-18)/2 negatif...... refused
y 2 = (-10+18)/2 =4
the width is 4
Answer:
140,120
Step-by-step explanation:
sum of angles in a quadrilateral =360
sum of the 1st two angles=60+40=100
360-100=260
the ratio of the remaining angles 7:6
therefore:
=140
for the second angle
260-140=120
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
let the plane intersects the join of points in the ratio k:1
let (x,y,z) be the point of intersection.
point of intersection is (8/3,14/3,8/3)
and ratio of division is 2:1
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
