Answer:
The correct total time is nineteen (19) days instead of twenty-one days.
Explanation:
Given the analysis of time for the project in parenthesis, it is feasible to merge some of the activities together by carrying them out simultaneously.
For example:
In the course of arranging and confirming the training facility to use which will last for 3 days, the development of the training material that ought to last for 5 days is brought down to a 2 days work because the initial 3 days for arrangement becomes vacant pending the reply on the final day. This brings the total days from 8 to 5.
Other days remain thus:
• Send an e-mail message to all department managers (1 day)
• Print copies of handout (2 days)
• Develop a set of PowerPoint slides (5 days)
• Conduct a practice training session with the instructor (2 days)
• Conduct the user training sessions (4 days).
Hence, total days are as follow:
5 +1 + 2 + 5 + 2 + 4 = 19 days.
The answer you are looking for is copyright
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": seeks to deliver superior value to buyers by satisfying their expectations on key attributes and beating rivals in meeting customer expectations on price.
Explanation:
Best-cost provider is a strategy by which suppliers attempt to provide consumers with high-quality products using methods of production that reduce costs. By doing so, suppliers would give more value to the money of their customers while meeting their expectations on the product purchased at the same time.
As production costs are lower, suppliers would be generating a comparative advantage.
Medium of exchange because it's the purchase that is in question here
Answer:
equitable relief
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
A lawyer refers to an individual who has obtained a law degree and is saddled with the responsibility of giving legal advice, initiate and execute lawsuits for his or her clients. These legal practitioners are saddled with the legal responsibility of listening to evidence and give a verdict about legal cases.
An equitable relief also referred to as equitable remedy can be defined as judicial remedies granted to an aggrieved person by a court of equity, requiring that the other party act or refrain from indulging in a specific act because ordinary legal remedies couldn't provide the aggrieved party sufficient (adequate) restitution for an offense commited against him or her. Thus, an equitable relief (remedy) is an injunction granted by a court of equity requiring a party to a contract to either act (mandamus or specific performance) or refrain from indulging in a particular act.
In this context, when a court of competent jurisdiction awards or grants custody of a child to one parent rather than awarding it to the other, this is an example of equitable relief.
In conclusion, an equitable relief or remedy is typically a nonmonetary judgement granted by a court of equity when ordinary legal remedies fail to provide sufficient (adequate) restitution to an aggrieved party.